It’s as sharp as it has always been

Despite the demise of C# being slightly exaggerated, there are still a lot of interesting blog being written about it. Eric Lippert’s blog has recently published a couple of really good posts on some parts of the C# language. No matter how often you’ve read the specification, or the various annotated guides to the language, Eric always manages to explain the rationale behind parts of the language in a way that I’ve never seen before.

Here he talks about the type of the null literal in C#. And explains that there are several constructs in C# that lead of objects which don’t have a type.

Here he talks about type checking a call to a covariant interface method. And in so doing makes it clear why the type inference mentions upper and lower bounds in the specification.

Here he talks about a probably long term bug in the Microsoft C# compiler, showing the desired fields could be expressed in IL and isn’t expressly forbidden by the C# specification.

In other C# news, I also came across this blog post that discusses the design of the cancellation framework in the TPL. It clearly lays out the reasons for the various parts of the design.

This entry was posted in Computers and Internet. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s